<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ConradHubbard.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog</link>
	<description>The chip is broadcasting...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 05:29:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Birthday Deva by Conrad Hubbard</title>
		<link>http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/2012/04/13/happy-birthday-deva-4/comment-page-1/#comment-7705</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad Hubbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 05:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/?p=744#comment-7705</guid>
		<description>http://www.conradhubbard.com/archive/deva/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.conradhubbard.com/archive/deva/" rel="nofollow">http://www.conradhubbard.com/archive/deva/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Birthday Deva by Laura Formerly known as Moniker</title>
		<link>http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/2010/04/13/happy-birthday-deva-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7701</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Formerly known as Moniker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/?p=698#comment-7701</guid>
		<description>I know this post is a couple years old and such. I know what its like growing up without a dad. Even though you did not make her you were the best father she could have ever asked for. I hope that in time she can see that you did try. Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this post is a couple years old and such. I know what its like growing up without a dad. Even though you did not make her you were the best father she could have ever asked for. I hope that in time she can see that you did try. Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Netflix Split by Conrad Hubbard</title>
		<link>http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/2011/09/19/netflix-split/comment-page-1/#comment-7699</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad Hubbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/?p=732#comment-7699</guid>
		<description>Actually, now that I have posted this, I have a thought as to one possible reason. Maybe they just want to sell off the DVD division at some point, to somebody who thinks it is worth it. By building a new brand, and severing the ties to their original brand, perhaps they are creating a corporation all packaged up to unload onto somebody else. Then they can use the cash to boost their main brand while potentially watching the spinoff die in somebody else&#039;s hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, now that I have posted this, I have a thought as to one possible reason. Maybe they just want to sell off the DVD division at some point, to somebody who thinks it is worth it. By building a new brand, and severing the ties to their original brand, perhaps they are creating a corporation all packaged up to unload onto somebody else. Then they can use the cash to boost their main brand while potentially watching the spinoff die in somebody else&#8217;s hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is There a Candidate? by Conrad Hubbard</title>
		<link>http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/2010/04/13/is-there-a-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-7685</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad Hubbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 02:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/?p=694#comment-7685</guid>
		<description>I understand there are reasons that some people vote for 3rd party candidates. I am suggesting that it doesn&#039;t seem like very many people actually do so, even when they self-identify as part of such a party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand there are reasons that some people vote for 3rd party candidates. I am suggesting that it doesn&#8217;t seem like very many people actually do so, even when they self-identify as part of such a party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is There a Candidate? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/2010/04/13/is-there-a-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-7684</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/?p=694#comment-7684</guid>
		<description>People vote for a third-party candidate because they don&#039;t want to continue routine support of the two parties that can&#039;t ever seem to prioritize our nation&#039;s welfare above their own political power grabs and consequently do so much damage to our country. If votes for a third-party candidate spoil the chances of a Republican&#039;s or Democrat&#039;s win then it&#039;s because that candidate didn&#039;t have the kind of popular support they needed in order to prevail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People vote for a third-party candidate because they don&#8217;t want to continue routine support of the two parties that can&#8217;t ever seem to prioritize our nation&#8217;s welfare above their own political power grabs and consequently do so much damage to our country. If votes for a third-party candidate spoil the chances of a Republican&#8217;s or Democrat&#8217;s win then it&#8217;s because that candidate didn&#8217;t have the kind of popular support they needed in order to prevail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Birthday Deva by Conrad Hubbard</title>
		<link>http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/2010/04/13/happy-birthday-deva-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7683</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad Hubbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 04:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/?p=698#comment-7683</guid>
		<description>Hm, interesting who I think posted that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, interesting who I think posted that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Birthday Deva by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/2010/04/13/happy-birthday-deva-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7681</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/?p=698#comment-7681</guid>
		<description>Divorce is ugly.

Let it go man.

Let it go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Divorce is ugly.</p>
<p>Let it go man.</p>
<p>Let it go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is There a Candidate? by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/2010/04/13/is-there-a-candidate/comment-page-1/#comment-7669</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/?p=694#comment-7669</guid>
		<description>Heh, teabaggers.

And I wasn&#039;t aware that the Tea Party was an actual party -- I&#039;d thought it was just a group of people who proclaim to be a grass-roots movement that are actually sponsored by the Republican party, Fox News, etc.  In other words, I just assumed they were a sub-group of Republicans.

As a side-note, the more I live the less I agree with Libertarian policies in practice.  Like socialism, it&#039;s good in theory, but I think it breaks down when you add real-life people.  I liken people in general to children, for the most part.  They are short-sighted, and really don&#039;t know what&#039;s best for themselves in many circumstances.  So while I agree with personal freedom in most things, I do think that there needs to be a central organizing force.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, teabaggers.</p>
<p>And I wasn&#8217;t aware that the Tea Party was an actual party &#8212; I&#8217;d thought it was just a group of people who proclaim to be a grass-roots movement that are actually sponsored by the Republican party, Fox News, etc.  In other words, I just assumed they were a sub-group of Republicans.</p>
<p>As a side-note, the more I live the less I agree with Libertarian policies in practice.  Like socialism, it&#8217;s good in theory, but I think it breaks down when you add real-life people.  I liken people in general to children, for the most part.  They are short-sighted, and really don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s best for themselves in many circumstances.  So while I agree with personal freedom in most things, I do think that there needs to be a central organizing force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Congress Against Democracy by Conrad Hubbard</title>
		<link>http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/2010/03/04/congress-against-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-7667</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad Hubbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/?p=682#comment-7667</guid>
		<description>True, although in a body of 100 people, a single vote is 1%. On a national level, if everybody could vote, that 1% would require more than 30 million people to vote for one issue over another.

I can&#039;t seem to find a link to the article right now, but I was recently reading that the way that a filibuster works was drastically changed. Once upon a time, a lone senator could hold up a bill by speaking for as long as he could stay awake, but he had to actually work for it. If the majority still held to their views after his best effort, then the bill passed, but he had a period of time limited only by his stamina to persuade them. Now, a filibuster only requires a senator to announce that he wants to filibuster. Then the bill is put aside until forever until it dies or 60 votes can be found, while the senator who is filibustering doesn&#039;t have to exert even the slightest of effort. The filibuster has been made so easy to do that it has become the de facto procedure in the Senate, and this is why laws now require 60% majority to pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, although in a body of 100 people, a single vote is 1%. On a national level, if everybody could vote, that 1% would require more than 30 million people to vote for one issue over another.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t seem to find a link to the article right now, but I was recently reading that the way that a filibuster works was drastically changed. Once upon a time, a lone senator could hold up a bill by speaking for as long as he could stay awake, but he had to actually work for it. If the majority still held to their views after his best effort, then the bill passed, but he had a period of time limited only by his stamina to persuade them. Now, a filibuster only requires a senator to announce that he wants to filibuster. Then the bill is put aside until forever until it dies or 60 votes can be found, while the senator who is filibustering doesn&#8217;t have to exert even the slightest of effort. The filibuster has been made so easy to do that it has become the de facto procedure in the Senate, and this is why laws now require 60% majority to pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Congress Against Democracy by Mike Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/2010/03/04/congress-against-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-7666</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conradhubbard.com/blog/?p=682#comment-7666</guid>
		<description>To play devil&#039;s advocate, perhaps it&#039;s because if something is close to 50%, then it&#039;s close enough to a &quot;tie&quot; that it brings question on whether or not it should be passed.  To take it a bit further, what if each individual citizen got to vote (a true democracy), and a single vote over 50% was the deciding vote?  Some might argue that would indicate that the country is indecisive on what should be done, and that a simple majority by one vote does not constitute the best method for resolving that indecisiveness, but rather it would be better to rework the bill/law until it is acceptable to something more than a just-barely-majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To play devil&#8217;s advocate, perhaps it&#8217;s because if something is close to 50%, then it&#8217;s close enough to a &#8220;tie&#8221; that it brings question on whether or not it should be passed.  To take it a bit further, what if each individual citizen got to vote (a true democracy), and a single vote over 50% was the deciding vote?  Some might argue that would indicate that the country is indecisive on what should be done, and that a simple majority by one vote does not constitute the best method for resolving that indecisiveness, but rather it would be better to rework the bill/law until it is acceptable to something more than a just-barely-majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

